BrianGarst.com

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

Iran Archive

Tuesday

12

December 2006

0

COMMENTS

Iranian Holocaust Conference Proceeding As Expecting

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

Nothing surprising here.

Addressing a conference in Tehran questioning the existence of the Holocaust on Monday, German-born Australian Frederick Toeben, said the Holocaust was “a great lie to justify the much more serious crimes committed by the Zionists in the past decades.” Toeben, who has served a jail sentence in Germany on charges of inciting racial hatred, denied that six million Jews had died during World War II saying that “if something had ever occurred,” the number of casualties would be much lower.

Holocaust denier Bradley R. Smith of the US told participants he is convinced that “gas chambers never existed because otherwise famous politicians like Winston Churchill, Franklin D. Roosevelt or the pope [Pious XII] would have certainly spoken.”

Robert Faurisson, a French professor who also denies the existence of gas chambers, addressed the conference Monday saying that it is “courageous and useful to establish the truth about something which never existed.”

“The courage of people like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will allow the truth to emerge in the end and uncover this great lie which has influenced the history of humanity from World War II until today,” he concluded.

Some Iranians, however, don’t appreciate their moonbat leader.

Dozens of Iranian students burnt pictures of President Ahmadinejad and chanted ?Death to the dictator? as he gave a speech at a university in Tehran yesterday.

Never has the hardline leader faced such open hostility at a public event, which came as Iran opened a conference questioning whether Nazi Germany murdered six million Jews.

Wednesday

6

December 2006

0

COMMENTS

I Wonder Which Way They'll Rule?

Written by , Posted in General/Misc.

Iran, self described “neutral judges”, will be holding a wacko-nutjob conference where the world’s biggest crazies will all huddle around and contemplate history’s great mystery…of whether or not there was a holocaust.

Iran will host an international conference next week on the Holocaust, with the central question being whether or not it actually took place. At the conclusion of the conference, the Iranians will decide on the answer.

I can’t wait.

Wednesday

15

November 2006

0

COMMENTS

Iran Complains

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

Iran has complained to the UN about…Israeli threats?

Iran, whose president has vowed to wipe Israel off the map, complained to the United Nations on Wednesday that the Jewish state was repeatedly threatening to bomb it.

The threats were “matters of extreme gravity” and the U.N. Security Council should condemn them and demand that Israel “cease and desist immediately from the threat of the use of force against members of the United Nations,” Iranian U.N. Ambassador Javad Zarif said.

This shows just what a mockery the United Nations is. For too many, it’s merely another tool of deception; another means to disrupt the functioning of the free world. Iran does not participate in good faith at any level, and yet it seeks to use the tools of international bodies against those who threaten only to defend themselves.

If outrageous threats leveled at members of the United Nations are to be found one need look no further than Iran, where Ahmadinejad recently promised, “we will soon witness [Israel’s] disappearance and destruction”.

Such comments from Ahmadinejad are not new. Shortly after assuming his role as President, he declared, “And God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without the United States and Zionism”. He also predicted that the “new wave of confrontations generated in Palestine and the growing turmoil in the Islamic world would in no time wipe Israel away”.

Hat tip: Threats Watch

Monday

30

October 2006

0

COMMENTS

An Insiders Look At Iran

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

There was an excellent article in OpinionJournal the other day which illuminated some of the working of Iranian society. Unfortunately, it offers bad news for those who hope for internal reform.

. . .I live in a country where alcohol is officially banned, but where the art of homemade spirits has reached new heights. Sharing my astonishment about the cocktail book with some friends with better connections to the Islamist regime, they explained the government has a silent pact with the educated and affluent in Iran’s big cities, who render politics unto Caesar, provided that Caesar keeps his nose out of their liquor cabinets.

In other words, the well-to-do Iranian drinks and reads and watches what he wishes. He does as he pleases behind the walls of his private mansions and villas. In return for his private comforts, the affluent Iranian is happy to sacrifice freedom of speech, most of his civil rights, and his freedom of association. The upper-middle class has been bought off by this pact, which makes a virtue of hypocrisy.

. . .”I can afford yearly two or three months’ vacation in Dubai, Europe or even America,” my friend said. “Why should I bother to organize a protest against seizing our satellite dishes? We may be forfeiting our freedoms, as you say, but when the price of avoiding the authorities is so affordable, why would we risk everything to take on the regime? We have to wait until society itself is disillusioned, and the masses open their eyes.”

In this world, it is only the principled intellectuals of moderate means who suffer, like my friend Farid Nazari, who courageously speaks his mind on all occasions and who operates a stall that sells banned books. He has had his inventory seized several times in the last two years. “We live in a circus,” he said. “We, as the people of culture, are victims of official idiosyncrasy. The authorities act impulsively based on whimsical assessments of risk. Their actions defy common sense and logic, so are completely unpredictable. It is that unpredictability that leads to panic and intellectual paralysis. That’s the secret of the current Iranian despotism.”

That, and hypocrisy. The well-to-do are paying a price for their comforts, and I wonder sometimes if they understand what it is. How can you have a revolution when everyone is watching TV?

The hardline Iranian government is not stupid. They understand the dangers dictatorships face and are apparently quite willing to look the other way on many issues, even in the face of their own ideology, in order to minimize the risk of serious challenge to their leadership. At the end of the article came this simple, yet very powerful, line:

“Farouz Farzami” is the pseudonym of a journalist who is forbidden to publish in Iran.