BrianGarst.com

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

Europe Archive

Wednesday

7

February 2007

0

COMMENTS

Europe's National Identity Crisis

Written by , Posted in Culture & Society, Foreign Affairs & Policy

There’s an excellent Australian op-ed that addresses the predicament Europe finds itself in. The author concludes that a strong rise of right-wing European nationalism is almost an inevitable response to the failures resulting from years of extreme multiculturalism.

Elsewhere in the West, a renewed clamour for national identity is a predictable and overdue response to the permissive extremes of the decades-long embrace of no-rules multiculturalism. The trend has been provoked by the rise of militant Islam, with its own competitive identity that transcends national borders.

. . .The new reality sits uncomfortably with the so-called progressive view that favours unbridled tolerance for the minority and a loathing for the dominant culture or conventional view. These themes are explored by Francis Fukuyama, professor of international political economy at Johns Hopkins School of International Studies, who says that if existing citizens do not sufficiently value their national citizenship, they can scarcely expect newcomers to value it. The potential cost of inaction is evident in comments by Middle East Forum director Daniel Pipes in The Australian today that opinion surveys in Britain consistently show 50 per cent of British Muslims would like to see the introduction of sharia Islamic law. This is akin to exchanging the constitution for the Koran.

Professor Fukuyama hits the nail square on the head. Modern Europe is so disgusted by its own existence and overwhelmed with Western guilt that it’s practically inviting a cultural invasion. How can people be expected to care for their country’s existence when nations are evil constructs to be scorned because they cause war, when values are to be dismissed because the adoption of certain beliefs itself represents a rejection of others, or when you can’t be proud of who you are because that means you think you are better than others? The problem is when a strong transnational ethos such as Islamism moves in and takes advantage of the identity void created by the self-hatred that comes from excessive multiculturalism.

. . .Unfortunately for the West, the liberal tolerance shown by the Left to minority groups has not always come with reciprocal obligations. Professor Fukuyama argues that Europe’s failure to better integrate its Muslim population is a ticking time bomb that has already contributed to terrorism. It is bound to provoke a sharper backlash from populist groups, and may even threaten European democracy itself.

At this point I’d have to say we’re well beyond “may…threaten”.

Tuesday

21

November 2006

0

COMMENTS

Freedom Works

Written by , Posted in Liberty & Limited Government

Personal responsibility works, Europe is apparantly learning.

European traffic planners are dreaming of streets free of rules and directives. They want drivers and pedestrians to interact in a free and humane way, as brethren — by means of friendly gestures, nods of the head and eye contact, without the harassment of prohibitions, restrictions and warning signs.

A project implemented by the European Union is currently seeing seven cities and regions clear-cutting their forest of traffic signs. Ejby, in Denmark, is participating in the experiment, as are Ipswich in England and the Belgian town of Ostende.

Psychologists have long revealed the senselessness of such exaggerated regulation. About 70 percent of traffic signs are ignored by drivers. What’s more, the glut of prohibitions is tantamount to treating the driver like a child and it also foments resentment. He may stop in front of the crosswalk, but that only makes him feel justified in preventing pedestrians from crossing the street on every other occasion. Every traffic light baits him with the promise of making it over the crossing while the light is still yellow.

“Unsafe is safe”

The result is that drivers find themselves enclosed by a corset of prescriptions, so that they develop a kind of tunnel vision: They’re constantly in search of their own advantage, and their good manners go out the window.

This describes the folly of pretty much all liberal government programs. Just as over regulation (no one is really suggesting the elimination of all traffic controls) of driving has stripped the individual from his responsibility to be cautious and mindful of others, massive social safety nets have taken away the need for people to take care of themselves, and others.

Hat tip: Cato-at-Liberty

Thursday

9

November 2006

0

COMMENTS

Why Europe Fails

Written by , Posted in Economics & the Economy, Free Markets, Liberty & Limited Government

In Praise of Long Hours

The EU’s Working Time Directive, passed in 1993 as a health and safety measure, caps the workweek at 48 hours. Most of the EU’s 25 members signed on to it, but the U.K. and Malta have always exercised the option to opt out. Many members, however-and particularly France-say the opt-out option gives those countries an unfair advantage. They want it eliminated-and are proposing legislation to do just that.

“People in the UK are willing to work harder and are thus doing better then us? Well, we can’t have that. Don’t let them work so much!” How do people even come to think this way?

No wonder European economies are barely holding together. Their first answer to any competitive problem is to make the other guy worse instead of making themselves better.

Hat tip: The Locker Room

Thursday

26

October 2006

0

COMMENTS

Lawsuit Over Danish Cartoons Thrown Out

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

From Townhall:

A Danish court rejected a lawsuit Thursday against the newspaper that first printed the controversial Prophet Muhammad cartoons. Arab politicians and intellectuals warned the verdict would widen the gap between Westerners and Muslims, but said mass protests were unlikely.

The City Court in Aarhus rejected claims by seven Danish Muslim groups that the 12 drawings printed in the Jyllands-Posten daily were meant to insult the prophet and make a mockery of Islam. Islamic law forbids any depiction of Prophet Muhammad, even positive ones, to prevent idolatry.

The court conceded that some Muslims saw the drawings as offensive, but found there was no basis to assume that “the purpose of the drawings was to present opinions that can belittle Muslims.”

…Jyllands-Posten’s editor in chief hailed the court’s decision as a victory for freedom of speech.

It’s good that the lawsuit was thrown out, but I’m not encouraged and don’t really consider this “a victory for freedom of speech”. It’s a harbringer of things to come, and the fact that it was even filed does not bode well for the future of intellectual freedom in Europe. After all, what if the cartoons had been intended “to present opinions that can belittle Muslims”? Is that really a sound cause of legal action? Everyone else can be belittled, but not Muslims? If you’re only allowed to express an opinion that doesn’t offend anyone then that’s not freedom of speech.