BrianGarst.com

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

Egypt Archive

Wednesday

12

September 2012

0

COMMENTS

Attacks in Egypt, Libya Reveal An American Sickness

Written by , Posted in Culture & Society, Foreign Affairs & Policy

The United States is under attack.  The attacks have taken place in both Egypt and Libya. The Egyptian attack, where a mob stormed the US Embassy in Cairo, tore down the US flag and replaced it with a black flag with the phrase ‘There is no god but God and Muhammad is his prophet,’ was believed to be in response to a film that portrayed Muhammad in an unflattering light. Prior to the violence, the US Embassy in Cairo preemptively apologized for the speech of a private US citizen with the following outrageously obsequious statement:

The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims – as we condemn efforts to offend believers of all religions. Today, the 11th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, Americans are honoring our patriots and those who serve our nation as the fitting response to the enemies of democracy. Respect for religious beliefs is a cornerstone of American democracy. We firmly reject the actions by those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others

That this statement was made by an official representative of the US government is an embarrassment. How dare they apologize for the speech of a US citizen, as if hurt feelings are somehow to be avoided at all costs. To do so in this manner on 9/11 just adds insult to injury.The Embassy then took to twitter to defend its obnoxious statement, while also issuing more, only to later memory hole the entire episode.

The Embassy is clearly confused about American values. Respect for religious beliefs is required by our government, which is not supposed to choose sides on the topic, but not at all of the people. Our people are free to express themselves about religion as they are any other topic, and that includes the ability to criticize –  as many frequently do in the US about every major religion – and the appropriate response if you are offended is more speech of your own. That’s what sensible, emotionally stable people do in the US every day, because the real cornerstones of our democracy are respect for the rights of others, such as that to life, liberty and property. The Egyptian mob reflected no such respect, and an American embassy that thought it more important to immediately condemn private US citizens for the hurt sensibilities of a violent and explosive mob culture is an utter embarrassment.

Freedom, the single most important cornerstone of American democracy, means tolerating the ideas of others even when you find them offensive. If we really believed in aiding freedom’s spread throughout the world, we’d be vigorously defending it in the face of those who neither understand nor respect it.

Yet it’s hard to defend something when your intellectual class does not respect it. Immediately following the thuggish reaction in Egypt, articles casting blame on the filmmaker emerged, and a college professor of “Religious Studies” called for the jailing of its producer. How are we so incapable of placing the moral responsibility for violence on those who commit violence?

The sickness and cultural backwardness witnessed in Egypt and Libya is easy to see and call out. There is something fundamentally wrong with a culture that erupts so easily into violent furor over every minor slight or insult. But we already knew this. What is striking is how the events reveal our own culture sickness – a debilitating self-doubt that makes it impossible for our representatives and intellectual class to condemn the easily condemnable.

Now there’s a second angle to the story, and it’s why I haven’t yet brought up the more violent nature of the attacks in Libya on a US consulate, which included the death of a American ambassador. Signs point in this case to a preplanned, terrorist attack, which seized upon the mob response to the film as a cover. If true, this attack demonstrates the ongoing danger posed by Islamists, and it draws into question the entire approach our government has taken to the “Arab spring,” once thought to be a democratic revolution but now looking like just a radical Islamist resurgence.

The US response to such an attack on our sovereign territory and the murder of our citizens must be sensible, but it also cannot afford to be weak. The preemptive apology to Egyptian thugs did not prevent their riot, and bending over backwards now to respond to these attacks will not prevent future attacks – it will likely encourage more of them. I don’t envy the President for having to navigate these waters, of needing to respond strongly but not excessively, but so far the actions of this government – and of the President who skips more than half of his daily intelligence briefings – have utterly failed to demonstrate the leadership necessary to quell this growing crisis.

Wednesday

16

February 2011

2

COMMENTS

Ugliness Moves From Egypt to the US

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

Some have taken to outrageous politicization in response to CBS reporter Lara Logan’s sexual assault in Tahrir Square on Friday. From the right, Debbie Schlussel has found that it “kinda warms her heart” when silly, naive reporters learn “just how ‘peaceful’ Muslims really are.” Journalists, you see, need to be disabused of their fantasies in the worst way.

Even if Schlussel’s characterization of the media is true, Lara Logan is not the media; she is a person. Whatever the sins of the media may be, she is neither singularly responsible for them, nor an appropriate agent for retributive justice. It is in no way “heart warming” for a person to be brutally assaulted.

From the left, we are told by the tweeter feed of enlightened NYU Center for Law and Security Fellow, Nir Rosen, that she had it coming because she didn’t buy the anti-McChrystal kool-aid from Rolling Stone. And because she was a “war monger” who dedicated her career to “promoting America’s wars.” Oh, and because, like, thousands of other women were probably “groped” too, so suck it up, lady!

The thing to remember about Egypt is that it’s real. The people there are not idealistic fantasies abstractly bringing about a political enlightenment. They are a real people – a real mob, even – who hold all manner of beliefs. Some are there to acquire freedom, while also respecting the rights of others to do so as well. Some are just there because they can be, or as a way to play out teenage fantasies of rebellion. They know not what they want, other than that it’s not whatever they have now. But others still are there simply to acquire power, a power they intend to abuse through the brutal imposition of 7th century values – the kind of values that give men no compunction in assaulting women out in public without proper cover or escort.

I don’t know whether Lara Logan understood the situation or not, as Schlussel suggests. I suspect that she did, being an experienced reporter. That she risked an attack such as this to do her job is commendable, and ought not in any way suggest that what happened is less than deplorable. She most certainly was not deserving of the attack, neither for her past coverage of contentious political issues, nor her membership in a profession occasionally prone to naiveté. She is a person, and those who forget it to score political points on the backs of her assault are as ugly as the perpetrators themselves.

Friday

11

February 2011

0

COMMENTS

Egypt: Now Comes the Hard Part

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

With news that Egyptian President Mubarak has finally stepped down after 30 years in power, freedom loving people the world over rejoiced. As a vociferous proponent of human liberty wherever humans may reside, I share in that joy. However, it’s important to realize that this is but a first, tiny step down the path to liberty, one which may well be followed by two steps back. The question the Egyptian people now face is this: What government do we wish to make for ourselves?

The last shot in the Revolutionary War, where Americans similarly decided they had been ruled by the same tyrant long enough, was not the end of our struggle but the beginning. What came next, while not as costly in terms of human lives, was arguably far more difficult; I’m talking about the task of establishing a lasting government of the people, and which would be their servant instead of their master.

Representative governments are hard work. Tyranny, oppression and poverty are the natural state of human affairs and not easily overcome. It takes more, much more, than just an election. Despotic countries the world over hold elections all the time. True representative government requires democratic institutions and civic culture. The people have to  live, breath and feel freedom not just for a few days or weeks, but for every moment of every day. As Ronald Reagan observed, even in the U.S., “freedom is never more than a generation away from extinction.”

The American Founding Fathers proved uniquely positioned in both place and time to capture a moment for freedom. They exhaustively debated the form of their new government, drawing upon centuries of wisdom, and carefully crafted a tapestry of freedom from the innumerable threads of knowledge spun over the centuries in the wheel of human history.  They then took their ideas to the people, recognizing that no government, however well designed, can be legitimate without the consent of the governed.

Are the Egyptian protesters prepared to make this long slog? Is their society ready for more than just elections, but the real cornerstones of democracy, like  tolerance and respect for the rights of fellow citizens, and civic participation? Or will they quietly fall back into old routines, accepting the authority of whatever figure emerges to fill the power void? They, like the American Founders, have a moment. What are they prepared to do with it?