BrianGarst.com

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

Britain Archive

Wednesday

25

March 2009

0

COMMENTS

Wednesday

3

September 2008

0

COMMENTS

Who Are They Protecting?

Written by , Posted in Free Markets, Health Care, Welfare & Entitlements, Liberty & Limited Government

From Britain, but the same basic story could just as well be told from America:

The head of the NHS rationing watchdog has said he is ‘genuinely sorry’ for a delay in approving a new treatment for blindness.

But campaigners said Andrew Dillon’s comments would be of little consolation to the thousands of Britons who have lost their sight in the two years it took NICE to make its final decision.

The watchdog has now approved Lucentis, which is used to treat wet age-related macular degeneration, a condition which affects 26,000 new sufferers every year.

NICE’s original recommendation was that patients had to wait until they went blind in one eye before they would be given treatment to save the sight in the other.

The proposal caused a huge public outcry from doctors and campaigners, prompting a U-turn in December last year before further consultation resulted in the final decision today.

NHS thought it was their responsibility to decide what level of risk warranted use of this drug. The public vehemently disagreed with the determination that the drug was only worth taking after eye-sight was lost in one eye.

Why is the individual’s own judgment not sufficient? Let people decide when they want to take a drug and risk the side-effects, not government. If they want to wait until they are blind in one eye, then they can. But no one knows better than the individual how to properly weigh the consequences of their choices.

Proponents of government interventionism always promote these watchdog groups as protecting consumers, but what they really do is needlessly delay the operation of the market. The real beneficiaries are the drug manufacturers, whose already approved products need not face the level of competition they otherwise would without government meddling.

Freedom is a wonderful thing. Let it happen.

Hat tip: OpenMarket.org

Tuesday

14

August 2007

0

COMMENTS

Britain Besieged By Gang Violence

Written by , Posted in Gun Rights

The Guardian reports on Britain’s gang problem:

In a city where more than 3,000 firearm incidents have been logged in the past 15 months, the sound of shots is just background noise for too many people. But last week’s ambush, which left a 25-year-old man struggling to survive serious wounds to his leg and abdomen, has taken gang warfare in Manchester, mainly black on black, to a new level.

. . .UK gun crime is still rare, but the numbers injured by firearms in England and Wales has more than doubled since 1998, with London, Greater Manchester and the West Midlands accounting for 54 per cent of recorded incidents. So concerned has the government become that last February Tony Blair held a gun crime summit at which plans were outlined for more funding for community groups and tougher punishments for offenders.

In 1997, Britain banned handguns. 57,000 hand guns were confiscated between July 1997 and February 1998.* Yet the article notes that “the numbers injured by firearms in England and Wales has more than doubled since 1998.” According to the anti-gun lobby, this shouldn’t be possible.

Britain never had a large population of hand gun owners, and such crimes had already been on the rise prior to the ban. So I don’t want anyone to get the idea that the ban caused this crime explosion, but it’s quite clear that Britain’s gun confiscations did absolutely nothing to reverse its upward crime trends. Gun restrictions do not reduce crime.

* Colin Greenwood. The British Handgun Ban: Logic, Politics and Effect, International Firearms Safety Seminar. New Zealand, February 2006.

Thursday

2

November 2006

0

COMMENTS

"Here, Let Me Assist You In Killing Me"

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

Do the British desire self extermination?

Ken Livingstone yesterday defended the right of extremist Abu Hamza’s son to work on the Underground. Mohamed Kamel Mostafa is himself a convicted terrorist but the mayor, who is in overall charge of the Tube, said: “We are happy to have him working for us.”

Mostafa, 25, from Wembley got security clearance despite serving three years in Yemen over a plot to bomb British and American tourists. His pass gave him access to tunnels beneath Parliament.

His 48-year-old father is serving seven years for inciting murder and racial hatred. The mayor said of Mostafa: “Has he broken any laws here in Britain? The answer is no.”

Words escape me.

Friday

13

October 2006

0

COMMENTS

Orwell Would Be Proud

Written by , Posted in Culture & Society

Schoolgirl arrested for refusing to study with non-English pupils

A teenage schoolgirl was arrested by police for racism after refusing to sit with a group of Asian students because some of them did not speak English.

. . .The 14-year-old – who was released without charge – said it had been a simple matter of commonsense and accused the school and police of an over-the-top reaction.

The incident happened in the same local education authority where a ten-year-old boy was prosecuted earlier this year for calling a schoolfriend racist names in the playground, a move branded by a judge “political correctness gone mad.”

. . .”She said I had to sit there with five Asian pupils,” said Codie yesterday.

“Only one could speak English, so she had to tell that one what to do so she could explain in their language. Then she sat me with them and said ‘Discuss’.”

According to Codie, the five – four boys and a girl – then began talking in a language she didn’t understand, thought to be Urdu, so she went to speak to the teacher.

“I said ‘I’m not being funny, but can I change groups because I can’t understand them?’ But she started shouting and screaming, saying ‘It’s racist, you’re going to get done by the police’.”

. . .A complaint was made to a police officer based full-time at the school, and more than a week after the incident on September 26 she was taken to Swinton police station and placed under arrest.

“They told me to take my laces out of my shoes and remove my jewellery, and I had my fingerprints and photograph taken,” said Codie. “It was awful.”

After questioning on suspicion of committing a section five racial public order offence, her mother Nicola says she was placed in a bare cell for three-and-a-half hours then released without charge.

. . .”We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards people and pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form.”

What they don’t aim to ensure, appearantly, is learning. Nobody cares if you can’t communicate with those you have to work with, just so long as nobody gets offended. Not to put too fine a point on it, but this is what happens when you put leftists in charge. These people are so hysterically self conscious that they are willing to arrest a 14 year old girl for not wanting to work with children she is incapable of communicating with.

Unbelievable. In a sane world, something like this would be unbelievable. Unfortunately, this kind of leftist hysteria and thought control is becoming all too common throughout the West.