BrianGarst.com

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

Barack Obama Archive

Wednesday

4

June 2008

0

COMMENTS

Obama Gives Big Government Liberal Speech

Written by , Posted in Election Time

Barack Obama has adorned himself the savior of America, condescendingly declaring that he can “make this country great again.” We don’t know what America was before Obama, but it was apparently anything but great.

The big finale of the speech was indistinguishable from the type that would be delivered by Hugo Chavez or any other populist leftist.

Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth. This was the moment – this was the time – when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves, and our highest ideals.

Does anyone actually find this inspiring? If so, allow me to say in plain english what he actually means.

This is the moment when we nationalize health care.

This is the moment when we ruin our record low unemployment rate with liberal policies.

This is the moment when we move to a centrally planned economy in the name of environmental stewardship. No aspect of economic activity will be out of the reach of regulators.

This is the moment where we surrender against our enemies, signaling a return to the time when they could attack us with impunity.

In summary, this is the moment where America would join the rest of the world as unexceptional and utterly dependent on government. Lest we forget, a government big enough to give you what you want is big enough to take it away.

Barack Obama is a good saleman, but the old consumer warning comes immediately to mind: buyer beware.

Wednesday

28

May 2008

0

COMMENTS

Racists Threaten Obamatopia

Written by , Posted in Election Time, Identity Politics, Media Bias

The narrative for the general election is being cast and anyone who doesn’t immediately jump on the Obama bandwagon will be accused of racism. CQ Politics frets that Obama will face a “racial challenge” in the general election. To substantiate the proposition that people who don’t support Obama are all just evil racists, the article rests heavily on Newsweek poll, an organization with a history of using shoddy polling methodology.

While Illinois Sen. Barack Obama runs dead even with Arizona Sen. John McCain in a new Newsweek poll at 46 percent each with 8 percent undecided, the survey took a hard look at the race factor by employing what it called a “Racial Resentment Index” to further analyze voting blocs and it concluded that, “Obama’s race may well explain his difficulty in winning over white voters.”

Questions in the poll that tested voters on issues that involved race included views on affirmative action, whether blacks or whites lost out more because of racial preferences in things like hiring or school admissions, whether racial discrimination or personal responsibility accounted for problems facing black Americans, opinions on interracial marriage and dating and reaction that white voters would have if a black American with equal education and income moved into their neighborhood.

Measuring people’s motivations is admittedly a difficult task, but this is a horrible conceptualization of racism. Newsweek’s “Racial Resentment Index” doesn’t measure racism, it measures liberalism! The only questions that possibly have anything to do with racism are the last two; the rest are just direct measures of an individual’s proclivity toward liberal policy. Support affirmative action? If so, you’re a good non-racist (liberal)! See everyone as victims rather than in control of their own destiny? If not, you must be a racist (and an evil conservative)!

Be prepared: the media will, at the behest of the Obama campaign, continue to assault non-Obama voters and insist on labeling them all racists, with ever greater frequency, the closer we get to the election.

Friday

16

May 2008

0

COMMENTS

Rewriting History In The Name Of The Messiah

Written by , Posted in Foreign Affairs & Policy

Seattle Times Blogger Bruce Ramsey has jumped the shark in defense of the media’s savior.

Democrats are rebuking President Bush for saying in his speech to the Knesset, here, that to “negotiate with terrorists and radicals” is “appeasement.” The Democrats took it as a slap at Barack Obama. What bothers me is the continual reference to Hitler and his National Socialists, particularly the British and French accommodation at the Munich Conference of 1938.

What Hitler was demanding was not unreasonable. He wanted the German-speaking areas of Europe under German authority. He had just annexed Austria, which was German-speaking, without bloodshed. There were two more small pieces of Germanic territory: the free city of Danzig and the Sudetenland, a border area of what is now the Czech Republic.

We live in an era when you do not change national borders for these sorts of reasons. But in 1938 it was different. Germany’s eastern and western borders had been redrawn 19 years before—and not to its benefit. In the democracies there was some sense of guilt with how Germany had been treated after World War I. Certainly there was a memory of the “Great War.” In 2008, we have entirely forgotten World War I, and how utterly unlike any conception of “The Good War” it was. When the British let Hitler have a slice of Czechoslovakia, they were following their historical wisdom: avoid war. War produces results far more horrible than you expected. War is a bad investment. It is not glorious. Don’t give anyone an excuse to start one.

And yet, give Hitler an excuse is exactly what they did. To the ambitious, weakness is an excuse for war. Hitler’s aggression was not some big surprise. Winston Churchill saw it coming well in time to prevent it. It’s painful how poorly Ramsey missed the point. If the objective is to avoid war, giving in to the demands of thugs, no matter how “reasonable,” is not the way to go about it.

Even if we accept his premise that the Palestinians have some territorial claim (they don’t), their true objective is much more than that. Just as Hitler’s own words made his aggressive intentions perfectly clear, so do those of the Palestinians. They want the total destruction of Israel. Appeasing their territorial demands will only encourage them to pursue this goal just as it did Hitler. That is the lesson that intelligent people were able to learn from WWII: appeasements makes war more, and not less, likely. Sadly, Bruce Ramsey and an ever increasing number of the left are not included in this group.

Wednesday

19

September 2007

0

COMMENTS

Here Come The Tax Increase Plans

Written by , Posted in Taxes

The Wall Street Journal, covering the tax plans unveiled by Democrats, has done a sadly inadequate job of reporting. The authors made no effort whatsoever to challenge blatant lies. Take this quote from Obama, for instance:

“For decades, we’ve seen a successful strategy to ride antitax sentiment in this country toward tax cuts that favor wealth, not work,” Illinois Sen. Barack Obama said as he unveiled his own “middle-class tax relief plan” yesterday. “We shouldn’t be distorting our tax code to benefit a few powerful special interests — we should be insisting that everyone pays their fair share, and when I’m president, they will.”

Where are the facts to justify Obama’s assertions? What is everyones “fair share”, and how does he conclude that they not currently paying it? This is an obvious allusion to Bush’s tax cuts, but a responsible journalist would retort by pointing out that after the Bush tax cuts, the tax code is more progressive than it was prior to the cuts.

The Democrats candidates are offering typical gimmicky vote buying schemes with this or that token handout to middle class voters, and the intention to turn around and bleed the life out of the economy to pay for their electioneering. Edwards and Obama are pledging to raise the capital gains tax, a sure-fire way to destroy economic growth. And who is it that will be hurt the most by an economic downturn? Not the rich.