BrianGarst.com

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

Taxes Archive

Wednesday

4

February 2009

0

COMMENTS

Paying Dues

Written by , Posted in Liberty & Limited Government, Taxes

The Guardian has a big series they are doing on tax evaders called Tax Gap.  In discussing the series, this article notes various responses they’ve gotten from across the political spectrum.  According to the Guardian, a number of responses “welcome the Guardian’s exposés as finally holding transnational corporations to account and asking them to pay their dues to the society from which they benefit.”

This kind of attitude is horribly misguided.  I’m not going to get into the debate over the actions of the companies the Guardian has reported on (most of it being legal, however).  Rather, I want to address this specific view that corporations owe society something, and that they are, to date, not supplying it.

The reasoning for this argument usually progresses as follows: “Corporation A has made X amount of profit in our country; they owe us!”

The unspoken implication of this reasoning is that Corporation A has provided nothing of value in return for its profit.  But this is false.  Profits are made by providing desired goods.  The people have benefited from Corporation A’s presence just as much, if not more, than Corporation A has – else it would have no profit.

There is a limited exception, which is the general benefit that rule of law provides to everyone.  However, there are two important caveats here.  First, the benefit is given to all, and corporations owe no more thanks for it than anyone else.  Second, and most important, the amount of tax revenue needed to actually fund this function of government is incredibly small compared to what governments today attempt to raise.  Even the biggest tax evading companies, if they still pay any taxes at all, are supplying enough funds to pay for their benefit from this.

The rest of the taxes collected go to funding massive welfare states and entitlement programs.  I’m not going to discuss the entirety of the moral and ethical arguments surrounding paying these taxes, other than to say that it is not sufficient to prove a moral obligation to pay for this simply by showing that a corporation has produced a profit.

Tuesday

3

February 2009

0

COMMENTS

What’s Good For Thee…

Written by , Posted in Taxes

Representative John Carter proposes to equalize the law for elected officials and the rest of us.  That’s right, what’s good for the tax-cheating liberal goose should be good for the gander.  Or something.

H.R. 735: Rangel Rule Act of 2009

‘Any individual who is a citizen of the United States and who writes ‘Rangel Rule’ on the top of the first page of the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 for any taxable year shall be exempt from any requirement to pay interest, and from any penalty, addition to tax, or additional amount, with respect to such return.’.

Tuesday

3

February 2009

0

COMMENTS

Saturday

31

January 2009

1

COMMENTS

Obama's Patriotism Deficient Cabinet

Written by , Posted in Taxes, Waste & Government Reform

“It’s time to be patriotic, time to jump in, time to be part of the deal, time to help get America out of the rut [by paying more taxes]”
– Vice President Joe Biden

Obama Appointments:

Tim Geithner – Secretary of the Treasury – owed $34,000 in back taxes.
Tom Daschle – Secretary of Health and Human Services – owed $128,203 in back taxes.

More to come?  How many other Obama nominees will be found out to lack patriotism, by Joe Biden’s standards?

Saturday

13

December 2008

0

COMMENTS

No Good As A Columnist

Written by , Posted in Taxes

I recently sent the following letter to the New York Times:

To the Editor:

Timothy Egan accurately titled his recent gutter column (“Typing Without a Clue,” Dec. 7). Although meant as a reference to Joe the Plumber, it more aptly describes Egan’s elitist screed.

Egan childishly hurls ad hominems at Joe, calling him “no good as a citizen” for owing a small amount in taxes. I challenge Egan to find anyone who can understand, and follow, our entire 70,000 page tax code. Is he prepared to hold Charlie Rangel’s far more serious transgressions to the same standard, or is his ire reserved for uppity peasants? He also makes the sophomoric argument that Joe is “no good as a plumber” because Tim the Snob isn’t satisfied with his government certification. By this standard – or any other for that matter – Egan is no good as a columnist.

Sincerely,

Brian Garst

Wednesday

3

December 2008

0

COMMENTS

Another Obama Promise Goes Down In Flames

Written by , Posted in Economics & the Economy, Energy and the Environment, Taxes

A funny thing happens when you become president, you can’t blindly advocate stupid ideas knowing you’ll never be held responsible for the outcome.  Apparently Obama realized this:

President-elect Barack Obama is not planning to implement a windfall profit tax on oil companies because prices have dropped below $80 a barrel, an aide said on Tuesday.

“President-elect Obama announced the policy during the campaign because oil prices were above $80 per barrel,” an aide on Obama’s transition team said. “They are currently below that now and expected to stay below that.”

Oil prices have fallen from a record $147 a barrel in July to under $50 this week.

That nonsense about the price of oil having anything to do with it (why the hell would you tax companies more for something they have no control over?) is just spin to placate the anti-capitalist left – who wanted to stick it to the big, eeeeeevil oil companies.  Far more likely, his economic team said, “Hey, this is a really dumb idea that will have very negative economic consequences.  Only an idiot would do this again.”

Obama is no idiot, so he probably knew this already.  But he is, apparently, a fraud who will promote idiotic policies, knowing they would be harmful if implented, to pander to his radical base.  It could be worse though: he could actually believe the nonsense he peddled for the last 2 years.

Tuesday

21

October 2008

0

COMMENTS

Spend And Spend (And Tax!)

Written by , Posted in Taxes

Barney Frank, still beholden to the failed policies of Keynesian economics, wants government to spend away!

Never mind the last 8 years we’ve spent criticizing Bush’s deficit spending (which only an idiot could have taken for anything more than an argument of convenience), it’s time to spend, spend, spend! Oh, and we’ll throw on some more burdensome taxes on “the rich” once we’ve got you all sufficiently distracted. As a stuffy conservative who doesn’t like change, it’s almost comforting to see that Democrats haven’t changed a lick, and are still singing the same tired old tune. Unfortunate for my wallet, though.

Hat tip: Say Anything Blog

Monday

13

October 2008

1

COMMENTS

Redefining Handouts

Written by , Posted in Economics & the Economy, Taxes

The Wall Street Journal exposes a devious slight of hand by the Obama campaign:

One of Barack Obama’s most potent campaign claims is that he’ll cut taxes for no less than 95% of “working families.” He’s even promising to cut taxes enough that the government’s tax share of GDP will be no more than 18.2% — which is lower than it is today.

…For the Obama Democrats, a tax cut is no longer letting you keep more of what you earn. In their lexicon, a tax cut includes tens of billions of dollars in government handouts that are disguised by the phrase “tax credit.” Mr. Obama is proposing to create or expand no fewer than seven such credits for individuals…

Here’s the political catch. All but the clean car credit would be “refundable,” which is Washington-speak for the fact that you can receive these checks even if you have no income-tax liability. In other words, they are an income transfer — a federal check — from taxpayers to nontaxpayers. Once upon a time we called this “welfare,” or in George McGovern’s 1972 campaign a “Demogrant.” Mr. Obama’s genius is to call it a tax cut.

So the Obama campaign is proposing a new slate of welfare handouts falsely hidden under the guise of tax cuts.   This trick also allows him to discount handouts as a cost of government, giving him misleading figures on the likely burden of government in terms of GDP.

Perhaps even worse, the article notes the affect on marginal tax rates of this scheme:

There’s another catch: Because Mr. Obama’s tax credits are phased out as incomes rise, they impose a huge “marginal” tax rate increase on low-income workers. The marginal tax rate refers to the rate on the next dollar of income earned.

High marginal tax rates provide a disincentive for harder work.  The net affect on the economy is then slower growth and less prosperity for all.  A report from the Fraser institute notes, “High and increasing marginal tax rates reduce economic growth by creating strong disincentives to hard work, savings, investment, and entrepreneurship.”

Already facing a period of economic hardship, thanks in large part to Obama’s Democrat colleagues, his fake tax cuts would do nothing but add fuel to the recessionary fire.

Saturday

12

July 2008

0

COMMENTS

Right Goal, Wrong Method

Written by , Posted in Liberty & Limited Government, Taxes

Senators Wyden and Snowe are proposing a 5-year ban on state increases on cell phone taxes.

According to a copy of the bill seen by Ars Technica, “No State or local jurisdiction shall impose a new discriminatory tax on or with respect to mobile services, mobile service providers, or mobile service property, during the 5-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.” Local tax raises are fine, but they cannot single out wireless service.

I applaud the belief that such taxes should be kept to a minimum.  I cannot, however, support the federal government usurping the right of the states to make such decisions simply because I do not like the decisions they are making.  It is up to voters to hold their state reps accountable.  That is the proper functioning of our federalist system; this bill is, therefore, misguided.

Wednesday

19

September 2007

0

COMMENTS

Here Come The Tax Increase Plans

Written by , Posted in Taxes

The Wall Street Journal, covering the tax plans unveiled by Democrats, has done a sadly inadequate job of reporting. The authors made no effort whatsoever to challenge blatant lies. Take this quote from Obama, for instance:

“For decades, we’ve seen a successful strategy to ride antitax sentiment in this country toward tax cuts that favor wealth, not work,” Illinois Sen. Barack Obama said as he unveiled his own “middle-class tax relief plan” yesterday. “We shouldn’t be distorting our tax code to benefit a few powerful special interests — we should be insisting that everyone pays their fair share, and when I’m president, they will.”

Where are the facts to justify Obama’s assertions? What is everyones “fair share”, and how does he conclude that they not currently paying it? This is an obvious allusion to Bush’s tax cuts, but a responsible journalist would retort by pointing out that after the Bush tax cuts, the tax code is more progressive than it was prior to the cuts.

The Democrats candidates are offering typical gimmicky vote buying schemes with this or that token handout to middle class voters, and the intention to turn around and bleed the life out of the economy to pay for their electioneering. Edwards and Obama are pledging to raise the capital gains tax, a sure-fire way to destroy economic growth. And who is it that will be hurt the most by an economic downturn? Not the rich.