BrianGarst.com

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.

Education Archive

Wednesday

26

August 2009

0

COMMENTS

Los Angeles Approves School Privatization

Written by , Posted in Education

Hundreds of schools to be privatized in Los Angeles:

The Los Angeles Board of Education approved a plan Tuesday that will allow outside groups to run up to a third of all district campuses, including 50 new multimillion-dollar campuses coming on line and more than 200 underperforming schools.

Authored by board member Yolie Flores Aguilar, the proposal was debated for weeks and advocated by Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and charter operators like Green Dot, groups that could eventually compete to run district schools under the new plan.

Competition is good, and the private sector is generally better than the government at delivering a service, but whose business the operators compete over is just as important a question to get right. Will they merely compete to please government oversight officials in charge of awarding contracts, or will they compete for the approval of consumers (parents and students) under a system of school choice? Only the latter is likely to result in significant innovation and improvements in educational outcomes.

Monday

3

August 2009

1

COMMENTS

A Lesson Not Learned

Written by , Posted in Education, Free Markets, Liberty & Limited Government

Three republicans, including a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, argued in a Washington Post editorial that Republicans should cooperate with the White House on education reform.  They note three items that President Obama has called for which Republicans generally support: 1) merit pay for teachers, 2) dismissal of ineffective teachers, and 3) expansion of public charter schools.  Furthermore, they argue that this is a wonderful opportunity for Republicans to show that they aren’t just “the party of no.”

At the risk of being pegged an obstructionist, I beg to differ. There’s nothing wrong with free marketers, conservatives, libertarian, Republicans or anyone else working with President Obama when he is right, but this is not such a case. Yes, these items are things which education reformers want to see happen, but how these ideas are implemented is just as important to get right as the ideas themselves. The President offers a top-down approach. After the failures of No Child Left Behind, Republicans should know better than to fall for that again.

The best way to ensure teacher accountability is not through promises to strengthen the political resolve to hold them more accountable – which never really works – but to actually make them accountable to the most interested party in the process, namely parents. When parents have a real choice where to send their children to school, and individual schools have a real choice as how best to educate those children, then and only then will there be accountability for the performance of teachers and schools. Only then will successful teachers and methods be rewarded while unsuccessful ones are punished.

In order for this to happen, states need the freedom to experiment with different education policies. Hooking state legislators on generous federal grants places them at the whim of federal policy desires. Today’s Department of Education recommendations could easily become tomorrow’s requirements. Given the animosity directed at school choice reforms by interest groups with strong influence at the federal level, Republicans should be pushing for a reduced federal role in education, and not supporting the President’s efforts to expand it, as a necessary first step in moving to school choice and real reform.

Friday

24

July 2009

0

COMMENTS

Universal Education Is Not A Model Worth Copying

Written by , Posted in Education, Health Care, Welfare & Entitlements, Labor Unions

Andrew Coulson of Cato has issued a challenge to readers and/or critics to name a field that has suffered the kind of productivity collapse seen in education over the last 40 years.  None of the suggestions so far have measured up.

So why has American education both gotten more expensive and less effective?  This story (Hat tip: John Stossel’s Take) might give you a hint:

Baltimore’s most successful middle school is laying off staff and shortening its school day to meet demands of a teachers union contract in what is one of the first major disputes over teacher pay between a charter school and a union.

KIPP Ujima Village Academy, based on a model that has forged a successful track record among poor students in more than a dozen states, has been violating a contract requiring teachers to be paid more if they work extra hours, school and union leaders acknowledge.

Advocates say the confrontation goes to the heart of what they see as a major weakness of Maryland’s charter school law: Teachers must be part of the union in their school district and subject to the contract. If the issue is not resolved, KIPP may ask state lawmakers to allow schools greater flexibility in determining teachers’ pay and workdays.

Students will attend classes for eight hours in the next school year, and Saturday classes have been canceled. The four layoffs include one music and one art teacher who were recently let go, as well as two staff members who worked with special education and struggling students.

Because education is largely delivered through political mechanisms, rather than the market, teachers unions have been uniquely successful in hijacking the industry.  They have supplanted the interests of children with their own.

Some want to emulate this model in other industries, like health care.  They should expect the same disastrous consequences – such as continuing price increases despite precipitous productivity declines – with universal health care as we have seen with universal education.

Sunday

21

June 2009

0

COMMENTS

Cantor Seeks To Redesign Dollar

Written by , Posted in Education

Eric Cantor (R-VA) has proposed legislation to redesign the one dollar bill. Specifically, the Liberty Bill Act (H.R. 2854) would “require the Secretary of the Treasury to redesign $1 Federal reserve notes so as to incorporate the preamble to the Constitution of the United States, a list describing the Articles of the Constitution, and a list describing the Amendments to the Constitution, on the reverse side of such notes.”

The bill states that Congress finds that “many Americans are unaware of the provisions of the Constitution of the United States, one of the most remarkable and important documents in world history.”

This is undoubtedly true, but what are we doing about all the members of Congress that are unaware of the provisions of the Constitution?

If we’re really serious about improving knowledge about the provisions of the Constitution, then what we need is to improve the primary method by which people acquire knowledge: our schools.  So we see once again that the best solution to an issue is to end the government monopoly on education.

Hat tip: OpenMarket

Monday

15

June 2009

0

COMMENTS

Adopt A Crummy School

Written by , Posted in Education

Not only has government forced children into a failed education monopoly, but now a candidate for New York City Council thinks the money extracted through taxes to pay for this crummy education just isn’t enough.  Rather, good citizens should pony up even more:

City Council Candidate Aaron Fraser is calling on business owners to put their money where their mouth is. He is calling on concerned parents as well as business owners to “Adopt a School” in their respective localities so that they can get the needed resources to propel our children into the future.

“It takes a village to raise a child,” (African proverb). City Council Candidate Aaron Fraser believes that the only way for children to thrive and progress academically is if the community and parents play an active role in nurturing and developing their talents.

If Mr Fraser wants a village to raise a child, maybe he should advocate removing the government monopoly that presents people in the village from being able to “put their money where their mouth is” by running their own schools.  Trying to shame people into throwing yet more money at a failed system is not going to improve education.

Sunday

7

June 2009

0

COMMENTS

School Choice Under Assault In Milwaukee

Written by , Posted in Education, Free Markets, Health Care, Welfare & Entitlements

From National Review:

Milwaukee is home to America’s most vibrant school-choice program: More than 20,000 students participate, almost all of them minorities. They have made academic gains and boast higher graduation rates than their peers in public schools. They even save money for taxpayers. Inevitably, Democrats in the state capital are trying to eviscerate the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program.

They’ve wanted to gut school choice for years, at the behest of teacher-union patrons who believe education should be a government monopoly. Until recently, Republicans have stood in the way. That changed following last year’s elections. Now, for the first time since the advent of school choice in Milwaukee two decades ago, Madison is a one-party capital. The governor, Jim Doyle, is a Democrat. Members of his party control both the state assembly and the state senate. School choice is in their crosshairs.

Last week, the legislature’s Joint Finance Committee approved a series of auditing, accrediting, and instructional requirements that will force successful voucher schools to shift resources away from classrooms and into administration. Several schools will have to comply with new bilingual-education mandates, even though many immigrant parents choose those schools precisely because they emphasize the rapid acquisition of English instead of native-language maintenance.

Sometimes onerous regulations are at least well-intentioned blunders. Not these. The enemies of school choice in Madison know exactly what they’re doing. In the name of “accountability,” they attack the quality of voucher schools with deadly precision. The goal is to make them as mediocre as the public schools they routinely outperform — and to leave parents, once again, without a choice.

Government has many tools in its choice destroying arsenal.  It doesn’t have to simply prohibit something to make it stop.  Government has similarly paved the way for its takeover of health care by devastating the private health insurance industry with mandates that force coverage for all sorts of things people don’t want.  After reducing the primary advantage of the market (flexibility and choice), government will swoop in for the kill.


Tuesday

19

May 2009

0

COMMENTS

GAO: Government Schools Abusing Special-Needs Children

Written by , Posted in Big Government, Education

In a disgusting reminder of the failures of government, a recent report from the Government Accountability Office (ha!) finds that schools are using abusive techniques to restrain and discipline special-needs children.  Some have even died as a result of this level of “care:”

Congressional auditors have uncovered widespread abuse of techniques used to restrain or discipline special-education students in U.S. schools, with some deaths linked to the practices, a top congressman says.

The findings are among those expected from a Government Accountability Office report scheduled to be released Tuesday. The report documented serious problems with the way children with disabilities are being treated in public schools, including cases of children being held face-down on the ground.

It should come as no surprise that the vast majority of cases in their study occurred at public schools.   While we often hear that the most vulnerable among us are a reason for government intervention in the private sphere, it is the vulnerable who government historically treats the worst.   This is because they have the least options available, and no ability to fight back and create political problems. You don’t see government schools beating up and abusing rich kids.

A common trend in these cases was the continued employment of the offending staff in public schools. At worst they get shuffled off to another school in the district.  Unlike private schools, they have no fear of going out of business as a consequence of their systemic abusiveness.  You have no choice but to support them with your tax dollars.

The report predictably focuses on the wrong prescription, highlighting the lack of state and federal laws as if that’s the great culprit here.  The real problem is a lack of accountability, a systemic feature of government monopoly education.

Friday

27

March 2009

0

COMMENTS

Obama’s Web Townhall

Written by , Posted in Education

Yesterday President Obama hosted the first ever online town hall, where questions were submitted online, and voted on, by citizens across the nation.  I commend the President for attempting to bring modern technology into his government.  Sadly, he faced none of my piercing questions.  But here they are for you:

1. “Why do you believe that you can allocate resources in a manner that is not prohibitively wasteful when no government in the history of the world has ever been able to successfully do so? What makes your technocrats better informed than free markets?”

2. “How does an energy tax not equal a tax on middle and lower income earners? Do you think we don’t use any energy? It’s money out of our pocket just the same as an income tax increase.”

3. “How do you justify prosecuting Madoff for running a pyramid scheme while the federal government continues to force us into one (Social Security) at the point of a gun? At least Madoff’s was voluntary!”

They were particularly hostile to my swipe at their beloved Social Security, voting question 3 down at a 2:1 ratio.  Question 1 did surprisingly well at almost a 1:1 ratio, garnering 19 positives for 23 negatives.

As for the substance of the event, it was as disappointing as one would expect from President Obama.  The first question Obama took was on education, and his answer was dreadful.  He identified two problems with education: lack of resources and a 19th century education model.

On the first problem, he says that there “aren’t enough teachers,” that they “aren’t getting enough of the training they need,” and that there’s a “shortage of supplies.”  He adds, “There are schools that I’ve seen that were built in the 1850 that are still being used but haven’t been upgraded the way they need to.”  He uses all this as evidence that there aren’t enough resources.  But this does not follow.  He refers to the second problem as “one that money alone cannot solve,” giving the impression that he thinks the first problem can be solved by money alone.  But if that were true, the problem would have been solved already.  Spending on education has continuously risen, while the problems described by the president have not gotten any better.

The problem is not lack of resources, but how those resources are allocated.  Specifically, the government run system lacks accountability and has little incentive to spend money improving education instead of padding administrative salaries.  The only way to solve this problem of allocation is to move to a market model, where competition will reduce inefficiencies and spur innovation.

On the second problem Obama similarly misses the mark.  Yes, our system is outdated.  Yes, we still have time off during the summer, despite the fact that most students aren’t going home to help with the harvest anymore.  But what is the reason?  The reason we have a 19th century model still operating in the 21st century is because a government run system is necessarily going to be unwieldy and unresponsive to changing circumstances.  Until we break the government monopoly on education, we will continue to toil in educational backwardness.

I noticed from the online voting that the most popular questions all had to do with marijuana legalization.  Obama did not ignore these questions.

THE PRESIDENT: Three point five million people voted. I have to say that there was one question that was voted on that ranked fairly high and that was whether legalizing marijuana would improve the economy — (laughter) — and job creation. And I don’t know what this says about the online audience — (laughter) — but I just want — I don’t want people to think that — this was a fairly popular question; we want to make sure that it was answered. The answer is, no, I don’t think that is a good strategy — (laughter) — to grow our economy. (Applause.)

So — all right.

He did, however, dismiss them without satisfactory answer.  Treating this issue as nothing more than a question of economic recovery, he ignored the larger dissatisfaction with the failed drug war and its consequences.

Most of the other questions were stupid, but you can read the rest of them here.

Monday

10

November 2008

0

COMMENTS

A Personal Choice For Some

Written by , Posted in Education, Free Markets

Compare these two stories.

Hundreds line up for school choice

Hundreds of parents lined up early this morning to sign up for the Brandywine School District’s school choice program, taking their place behind about 35 parents who had camped out overnight for a spot at the front of the line.

The sign-up was supposed to begin at 8 a.m., but the doors opened at 6:45 to accommodate the crowd.
Advertisement

Parents had been lining up since about 2 p.m. Sunday for the opportunity to sign up for the district’s limited number of spaces.

A Crucial Decision For the Obamas: Public or Private?

Like many parents moving their children to Washington, Barack and Michelle Obama will be told to avoid D.C. public schools. Is that good advice?

This is a tricky subject. School choice is very personal. The president-elect’s fifth-grade daughter, Malia, and second-grade daughter, Sasha, have been attending the first-rate, private University of Chicago Laboratory Schools. I bet they transfer to Georgetown Day School, a good fit because of its similarity to their current school, its historic role as the city’s first racially integrated school and the presence of Obama senior legal adviser Eric H. Holder Jr. on its board of trustees. It would be a sensible decision by two smart, caring people.
ad_icon

But it wouldn’t hurt to look around first. Georgetown Day, like other private schools, would charge them nearly $56,000 a year for two kids. Why not see what their tax dollars are paying for? One educational gem happens to be the closest public school to their new home. Strong John Thomson Elementary School is at 1200 L St. NW, three-fifths of a mile from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Go north on 15th, turn right on L and three blocks farther it’s on the right.

School choice may be personal for the Obama’s, but thanks to the policies of President-elect Obama and his friends at the NEA, many are denied that choice. Unable to afford to both pay taxes for public schooling and enroll their children in private schools, many are trapped in a failing government school system.  Or they have to line up all night to fight over a few school choice bread crumbs.  But why should Obama care? The two girls lucky enough to share his last name will do just fine.

Tuesday

14

October 2008

0

COMMENTS

Why Do Conservatives Continue To Support NCLB?

Written by , Posted in Education, Liberty & Limited Government

A Washington Post article features a story on how NCLB deals with a school of special needs children:

Stephen Knolls School suffered the ignominy of failure under federal law in 2006 and 2007 for low test scores. This year, the Kensington school finally made the grade in reading and math — only to be sanctioned for poor attendance.

The challenge in this case is not truancy. Stephen Knolls serves medically fragile children with severe physical and cognitive disabilities, such as cerebral palsy, spina bifida and Rett syndrome.

“We know that there are legitimate reasons for [students] to be home,” said Tina Shrewsbury, school coordinator. “They’re going to [medical] specialists. . . . They’re having lab tests done. They’re being hospitalized.”

The dispute offers “a classic case of how well-intentioned federal policy has gone awry,” said Bruce Fuller, a professor of education and public policy at the University of California at Berkeley. “This district is earnestly trying to follow the spirit of the No Child law.” But that doesn’t give Stephen Knolls any help with a rating system controlled by the state and federal governments.

Conservatives routinely rail against the folly of relying only on good intentions in government policy.  There is no doubt that NCLB identified a flaw in the current educational system, a lack of accountability, and was a good faith effort to address that flaw.  The problem is that, in doing so, President Bush abandoned any pretense of conservative understanding of the limits of government solutions, not to mention any belief in state’s rights.  Thus it is easily understood why he was joined by Ted Kennedy in championing the bill.

NCLB and Stephen Knolls School exemplify the problem with government solutions: they are inflexible, one-size-fits-all programs largely incapable of adapting to local circumstances.  Our education system is in dire need of accountability if it is ever going to perform up to the standards we desire, but that accountability cannot by supplied by government.   The Republican party used to understand this when it elected Reagan on a platform that included the desired abolition of the Department of Education.

The only way to bring real accountability to our education system is to return power to the people who have the most at stake: parents and students.  End the government monopoly on education and the goals of NCLB would be moot.  Give people choice and see how quickly things improve.  That is the solution conservatives should support.